Okamura v. Ctc Construction Company

209 P.3d 1233
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJune 4, 2009
Docket28412
StatusPublished

This text of 209 P.3d 1233 (Okamura v. Ctc Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Okamura v. Ctc Construction Company, 209 P.3d 1233 (haw 2009).

Opinion

TERRI T. OKAMURA, Pet it ioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.T.C. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Hawaii corporation, and HYUNDAE PLUMBING, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees, and
HERMAN Y. HO; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; and DOE ENTITIES 1-20, Respondents/Defendants. (CIV. NO. 03-1-2037)
TERRI T. OKAMURA, Petitioner/Plaintiff,
v.
C.T.C. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LIMITED, a Hawaii Corporation, and STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1-20, DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; and DOE ENTITIES 1-20, Respondents/Defendants (CIV. NO. 06-1-0126)

No. 28412.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

June 4, 2009.

Junsuke Otsuka, for petitioner/plaintiff-appellant. on the application.

Arthur S.K. Fong and respondent/defendant-appellee C.T.C. Construction Company, Limited on the response.

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Duffy, J., for the court[1]

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Terri T. Okamura's application for writ of certiorari, filed on May 4, 2009, is hereby rejected.

NOTES

[1] Considered by: Moon, C . J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge August, assigned by reason of vacancy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 P.3d 1233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/okamura-v-ctc-construction-company-haw-2009.