Ojuola v. New York State Division of Human Rights

95 A.D.3d 701, 943 N.Y.S.2d 893

This text of 95 A.D.3d 701 (Ojuola v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ojuola v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 95 A.D.3d 701, 943 N.Y.S.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered November 1, 2011, which, to the extent appealable, denied petitioner’s motion to renew his article 78 petition challenging a determination by the New York State Division of Human Rights, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS court properly denied the motion to renew, as petitioner submitted no new facts in support of his petition (William P. Pahl Equip. Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1992], lv denied in part and dismissed in part 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568 [1979]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foley v. Roche
68 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
William P. Pahl Equipment Corp. v. Kassis
182 A.D.2d 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 701, 943 N.Y.S.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ojuola-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-2012.