Ojong v. Holder

442 F. App'x 820
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2011·No. No. 10-2307·Published

Opinion

[821]*821Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Ojong, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Ojong’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ojong, (B.I.A. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ojong v. Holder, 442 F. App'x 820 (4th Cir. 2011).

442 F. App'x 820 (Ojong v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related