Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 565 F.3d 1175
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2009·No. 06-55522·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK O. OJO, Attorney, on  behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 06-55522 v. FARMERS GROUP, INC.; FIRE  D.C. No. CV-05-05818-JFW UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION; FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE; FARMERS ORDER UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION; FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed October 26, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

14717 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc., (9th Cir. 2009).

Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc. (Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.