Ojeda v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ojeda v. Blum

81 A.D.2d 589, 441 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11074

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 589 (Ojeda v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ojeda v. Blum, 81 A.D.2d 589, 441 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent-State commissioner dated December 5, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency relating to the adequacy of a grant of aid to dependent children, and for other relief, including a reasonable counsel fee. While the proceeding was pending in this court, the petitioner stipulated with respondents to withdraw all her claims except for her “claim for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988”. Proceeding dismissed on the merits with respect to counsel fees, without costs or disbursements. We find the claim concerning counsel fees to be without merit (see Matter of Bess v Toia, 66 AD2d 844). Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent-State commissioner dated December 5, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency relating to the adequacy of a grant of aid to dependent children, and for other relief, including a reasonable counsel fee. While the proceeding was pending in this court, the petitioner stipulated with respondents to withdraw all her claims except for her “claim for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988”. Proceeding dismissed on the merits with respect to counsel fees, without costs or disbursements. We find the claim concerning counsel fees to be without merit (see Matter of Bess v Toia, 66 AD2d 844). Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 589, 441 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ojeda-v-blum-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack