Oil Well Supply Co. v. Ulrich Stewart Mfg. Co.
Opinion
The assignments of error are to the confirmation of the report of an auditor of the account of a receiver of an insolvent corporation. The main complaint is that a personal claim by the receiver for the value of property alleged by him to have been delivered to the corporation at the time of its organization was disal[379] lowed. A discussion of the details of the controversy between the receiver and the creditors of the corporation would serve no useful purpose. The question before the auditor was one of fact purely. We have repeatedly said that the findings of fact by an auditor, approved by the court, will not be disturbed unless it is clearly shown that they are erroneous. Ordinarily the limit of our inquiry in reviewing findings of fact, is to ascertain whether there was testimony, which, if believed, would sustain the findings: Steinmeyer v. Siebert, 190 Pa. 471; Rorabaugh’s Estate, 229 Pa. 377. There was ample testimony to sustain tbe findings made.
The order is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
83 A. 208 (Oil Well Supply Co. v. Ulrich Stewart Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.