Oil Co. v. . Moore

141 S.E. 926, 195 N.C. 305, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 73
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 14, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 141 S.E. 926 (Oil Co. v. . Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oil Co. v. . Moore, 141 S.E. 926, 195 N.C. 305, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 73 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Civil action to recover $631.05, with interest, for goods sold by plaintiff and delivered to defendants on what is styled the "Columbia account."

The defendants offered in evidence a check for $3,681.98, made payable to the plaintiff, bearing notation: "Payment in full of all accounts to date," and contended that the account in suit was covered by said payment.

But there was evidence that this check was given to plaintiff's agent at Kinston and that it only covered accounts in his district, which did not include the Columbia account.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of all the evidence the plaintiff appeals. Reversed on authority of Refining Corporation v. Sanders, 190 N.C. 203,129 S.E. 607, and Bogert v. Mfg. Co., 172 N.C. 248, 90 S.E. 208.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lochner v. Silver Sales Service, Inc.
59 S.E.2d 218 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Youngblood v. . Taylor
150 S.E. 614 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.E. 926, 195 N.C. 305, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oil-co-v-moore-nc-1928.