Oil City v. Lay

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Oil City v. Lay

30 A. 289, 164 Pa. 370, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1084

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 15, 1894

DocketAppeal, No. 200

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A. 289 (Oil City v. Lay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oil City v. Lay, 30 A. 289, 164 Pa. 370, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1084 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that there was no error in entering judgment' against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. For aught that sufficiently appears in the defendant’s affidavit, the ordinance, under which the curbing and paving were done and lien therefor filed, was valid and binding, and the plaintiff should be permitted to collect the amount thereof.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that there was no error in entering judgment' against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. For aught that sufficiently appears in the defendant’s affidavit, the ordinance, under which the curbing and paving were done and lien therefor filed, was valid and binding, and the plaintiff should be permitted to collect the amount thereof.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A. 289, 164 Pa. 370, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oil-city-v-lay-pa-1894.