Ohrt v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ohrt v. United States

19 Cust. Ct. 266, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1329

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 10, 1947

DocketNo. 7401; Entry No. DE 5001

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Cust. Ct. 266 (Ohrt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ohrt v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 266, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1329 (cusc 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was sterling 9-9-3 per unit, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was sterling 9-9-3 per unit, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Cust. Ct. 266, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohrt-v-united-states-cusc-1947.