Ohnmacht v. Goord

47 A.D.3d 1030, 850 N.Y.S.2d 245
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 47 A.D.3d 1030 (Ohnmacht v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ohnmacht v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 1030, 850 N.Y.S.2d 245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

During an altercation with a correction officer, petitioner struck the officer in the face. He was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff and found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored it as well as another officer present in the area of the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Abdullah v Goord, 36 AD3d 978, 979 [2007]). The contrary testimony given by petitioner and his inmate witness presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Thomas v Goord, 34 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2006]). Moreover, we find no error in the Hearing Officer’s refusal to recuse himself, nor do we find any indication that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Nelson v Goord, 33 AD3d 1135, 1136 [2006]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions are either lacking in merit or have not been preserved for our review.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Fischer
100 A.D.3d 1310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Frazier v. Prack
62 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Dozier v. Selsky
54 A.D.3d 1074 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Jackson v. Smith
49 A.D.3d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.3d 1030, 850 N.Y.S.2d 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohnmacht-v-goord-nyappdiv-2008.