Ohlandt v. Joost

53 P. 213, 6 Cal. Unrep. 10
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 3, 1898
DocketS. F. No. 1442
StatusPublished

This text of 53 P. 213 (Ohlandt v. Joost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ohlandt v. Joost, 53 P. 213, 6 Cal. Unrep. 10 (Cal. 1898).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that a determination of the motion to dismiss the appeal in this ease involves the necessity of an examination into the merits of the appeal, it is ordered that said motion be, and it is hereby, denied, with leave to the respondents to renew such motion in submitting said cause upon the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 P. 213, 6 Cal. Unrep. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohlandt-v-joost-cal-1898.