Ohlandt v. Joost

53 P. 213, 6 Cal. Unrep. 10
California Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 1898·No. S. F. No. 1442·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that a determination of the motion to dismiss the appeal in this ease involves the necessity of an examination into the merits of the appeal, it is ordered that said motion be, and it is hereby, denied, with leave to the respondents to renew such motion in submitting said cause upon the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohlandt v. Joost, 53 P. 213, 6 Cal. Unrep. 10 (Cal. 1898).

53 P. 213 (Ohlandt v. Joost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Donnell v. Murphy
100 P. 1071 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)