Ohl v. Walder
134 A. 844, 100 N.J. Eq. 350, 15 Stock. 350, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 573
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Mtnturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, PIeteield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ohl v. Walder, 134 A. 844, 100 N.J. Eq. 350, 15 Stock. 350, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 573 (N.J. 1926).
134 A. 844 (Ohl v. Walder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.