Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon Borough
This text of 251 U.S. 542 (Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The attention of counsel is directed to the question of whether under the state law the right to review the action of the commission was limited by the state statutes to the particular remedy which was here resorted to, or whether such statutes left open the right to invoke judicial power by way of independent suit for the purpose of redressing wrongs deemed to have resulted from action taken by the commission. Mr. William Watson Smith and Mr. George B. Gordon, with whom Mr. $ohn G. Buchanan was on the briefs, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Berne H. Evans and Mr. Leonard K. Guiler, with whom Mr. David L. Starr and Mr. Albert G. Liddell were on the briefs, for defendants in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 583, 64 L. Ed. 405, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-valley-water-co-v-ben-avon-borough-scotus-1919.