Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. Stewart
This text of 96 A. 1098 (Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned chancellor below committed no error in finding that the appellee had fully accounted for all moneys and property for which he was responsible. This is all that need be said on the contention of counsel for appellant that a master ought to have been appointed. The appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed at appellant’s costs on the opinion of the court below dismissing the exceptions to findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A. 1098, 251 Pa. 544, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-valley-trust-co-v-stewart-pa-1916.