Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Bulen

437 F.3d 421, 2006 WL 367256
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2006·No. 04-2129(L), CA-03-2281-3·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is the appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc.

An active judge having called for a poll of the Court on the appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc, such poll has been conducted and has failed to garner majority support of the active judges. Judges Michael, Motz, and King voted in favor of rehearing en banc, whereas Judges Widener, Niemeyer, Luttig, Shedd, and Duncan voted against rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkins, along with Judges Wilkinson, Williams, Traxler, and Gregory, deemed themselves disqualified and did not participate.

Pursuant to the foregoing, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Judge King wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, which was joined by Judge Michael and Judge Motz and is filed herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Bulen, 437 F.3d 421, 2006 WL 367256 (4th Cir. 2006).

437 F.3d 421 (Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Bulen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. William Bulen
437 F.3d 421 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)