Ohio v. Patton
This text of 1 Tapp. Rep. 96 (Ohio v. Patton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
to the defendant. — Is ' it a statement of facts, or an argument, you wish to make.
Patton. — A statement of facts, may it please your honor.
President. —It cannot be permitted. This is not a request that the defendant may be allowed to comment on the evidence given, but that he may be allowed to make statements to the jury of matters not given in evidence. Statements made by the defendant, on oath, would not be receivable evidence in any stage of this trial. He cann ot be a witness for himself: a fortiori, then, parole statements, or allegations not on oath, cannot be evidence. The jury are to decide this issue on the evidence given to them. It is the duty of the court to see that such evidence is competent and proper. The jury are not to be asked to found their verdict upon a tale told by a party to the suit: this would be to ask them to disregard the oaths they have taken. — Eefused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Tapp. Rep. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-v-patton-ohctcompljeffer-1816.