Ohio v. Huertas
498 U.S. 997, 112 L. Ed. 2d 561
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 3, 1990·No. No. 89-1944·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Ohio. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 807.] Motions of Washington Legal Foundation et al. and Appellate Committee of the California District Attorneys Association for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ohio v. Huertas, 498 U.S. 997, 112 L. Ed. 2d 561 (1990).
498 U.S. 997 (Ohio v. Huertas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hester
618 So. 2d 1365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Jill S. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., and Cash Equivalent Fund
939 F.2d 458 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)
RCM Securities Fund, Inc. v. Stanton
928 F.2d 1318 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Kalish v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.
928 F.2d 590 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Lucyle Kalish v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.
928 F.2d 590 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto Company
926 F.2d 596 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)