Home/D.C. Circuit/Ohio v. Department of Interior

Ohio v. Department of Interior

897 F.2d 1151, 283 U.S. App. D.C. 129
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided September 11, 1989·No. No. 86-1529·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition For Rehearing of Petitioners and Intervenors it is

ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition is denied.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Joint Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc of Petitioners and Intervenors has been circulated to the full Court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

A statement of Circuit Judge SILBERMAN is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio v. Department of Interior, 897 F.2d 1151, 283 U.S. App. D.C. 129 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

897 F.2d 1151 (Ohio v. Department of Interior) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Of Ohio v. Department Of Interior
897 F.2d 1151 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)