Ohio v. Department of Interior

897 F.2d 1151, 283 U.S. App. D.C. 129
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedSeptember 11, 1989
DocketNo. 86-1529
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 897 F.2d 1151 (Ohio v. Department of Interior) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ohio v. Department of Interior, 897 F.2d 1151, 283 U.S. App. D.C. 129 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition For Rehearing of Petitioners and Intervenors it is

ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition is denied.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

The Joint Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc of Petitioners and Intervenors has been circulated to the full Court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

A statement of Circuit Judge SILBERMAN is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Of Ohio v. Department Of Interior
897 F.2d 1151 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
897 F.2d 1151, 283 U.S. App. D.C. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-v-department-of-interior-cadc-1989.