Ohio v. Davis
1 Tapp. Rep. 171
Opinion
The counsel agreeing, the cause was continued to the next term, to argue the motion in arrest; but the prisoner having escaped, no argument was had or opinion given.
The question, whether soliciting and inciting another, to commit a felony, is an indictable offence, is considered and decided in The King vs. Higgins, 2d East, 5th — see, also, Foster, 195, 125 — 2d Show., 1 — 2d Ld. Rayn., 1167 — 2d Ld. Rayn., 1377 — 2d Burr, 2494 — Fitzg., 263 — and 6th East, 464.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ohio v. Davis, 1 Tapp. Rep. 171 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1817).
1 Tapp. Rep. 171 (Ohio v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.