Ohio v. Davis

Belmont County Court of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Davis

1 Tapp. Rep. 171

CourtBelmont County Court of Common Pleas

DecidedAugust 15, 1817

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tapp. Rep. 171 (Ohio v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Belmont County Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ohio v. Davis, 1 Tapp. Rep. 171 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

The counsel agreeing, the cause was continued to the next term, to argue the motion in arrest; but the prisoner having escaped, no argument was had or opinion given.

The question, whether soliciting and inciting another, to commit a felony, is an indictable offence, is considered and decided in The King vs. Higgins, 2d East, 5th — see, also, Foster, 195, 125 — 2d Show., 1 — 2d Ld. Rayn., 1167 — 2d Ld. Rayn., 1377 — 2d Burr, 2494 — Fitzg., 263 — and 6th East, 464.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The counsel agreeing, the cause was continued to the next term, to argue the motion in arrest; but the prisoner having escaped, no argument was had or opinion given.

The question, whether soliciting and inciting another, to commit a felony, is an indictable offence, is considered and decided in The King vs. Higgins, 2d East, 5th — see, also, Foster, 195, 125 — 2d Show., 1 — 2d Ld. Rayn., 1167 — 2d Ld. Rayn., 1377 — 2d Burr, 2494 — Fitzg., 263 — and 6th East, 464.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Tapp. Rep. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-v-davis-ohctcomplbelmon-1817.