Ohio v. Clark

135 S. Ct. 696, 190 L. Ed. 2d 387, 83 U.S.L.W. 3304, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7702

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ohio v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 576 U.S. 237 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 17, 2014·No. No. 13–1352.·Published

Opinion

Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. Jeffrey L. Fisher, Esquire, of Stanford, California is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio v. Clark, 135 S. Ct. 696, 190 L. Ed. 2d 387, 83 U.S.L.W. 3304, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7702 (U.S. 2014).

Pincite

135 S. Ct. 696 (Ohio v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.