Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Zuckerman

719 N.E.2d 552, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1225, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3593
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Zuckerman. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 Ohio St. 3d 148
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 8, 1999·No. No. 97-2670·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Richard Zuckerman, Attorney Registration No. 0025680, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of September 16, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of [1226] one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Richard Zuckerman be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Zuckerman (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 148, 699 N.E.2d 40.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnigk, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Zuckerman, 719 N.E.2d 552, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1225, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3593 (Ohio 1999).

719 N.E.2d 552 (Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Zuckerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.