Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Orosz

449 N.E.2d 1310, 5 Ohio St. 3d 204, 5 Ohio B. 419, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 749
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1983·No. D.D. No. 83-13·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court has examined the record developed before the board and concurs in the board’s finding that respondent was heavily involved in illegal drug activity and violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), and (6). Moreover, respondent failed to obtain counsel to make an appearance in this proceeding and present any evidence whatsoever in mitigation of the charges brought by relator. Accordingly, we adopt the recommendation of the board and order that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Orosz, 449 N.E.2d 1310, 5 Ohio St. 3d 204, 5 Ohio B. 419, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 749 (Ohio 1983).

449 N.E.2d 1310 (Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Orosz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Branch
2013 Ohio 2350 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
Matter of Rivkind
791 P.2d 1037 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1990)
In Re Frick
694 S.W.2d 473 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1985)