Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Ohralik

357 N.E.2d 1097, 48 Ohio St. 2d 217, 2 Ohio Op. 3d 397, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 738
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1976·No. D. D. No. 76-8·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

DR 2-103 (A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides:

• “A lawyer shall not recommend employment, as a private practitioner, of himself, his partner, or associate to a non-láwyer who has not sought his advice regarding employment of a lawyer.”

•DR 2-104(A) reads:

::: -“A lawyer who has given unsolicited advice to a layman that he should obtain counsel or take legal action shall, not accept employment resulting from that advice, except that': *■ * * [exceptions not applicable here].”

: A review of the record before us reflects ample, un-controverted evidence supportive of the finding, of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and. Discipline that respondent, Albert Ohralik, violated DR 2-103 (A) and DR 2404(A), set forth above,' in soliciting and obtaining agreements from Carol McClintock and Wanda Lou Holbert to represent each of them in their respective claims for damages arising out of the accident of February 2,1974.

It is- the considered judgment of this eotirt that , respondent be: indefinitely suspended from the practice of láw for these unethical violations of the Code of Profes-•sien'al Responsibility. ' -

Judgment’accordingly.'.

!' O’Neill, C.J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Ohralik, 357 N.E.2d 1097, 48 Ohio St. 2d 217, 2 Ohio Op. 3d 397, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 738 (Ohio 1976).

357 N.E.2d 1097 (Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Ohralik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Teichner
387 N.E.2d 265 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1979)
Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Ass'n
434 U.S. 814 (Supreme Court, 1977)