Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Jewett

462 N.E.2d 1221, 11 Ohio St. 3d 22, 11 Ohio B. 55, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1094
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 9, 1984·No. D.D. No. 83-41·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully reviewed the findings of the board, and concur that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Insofar as no objections have been made, we adopt the board’s recommendation and order respondent suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Jewett, 462 N.E.2d 1221, 11 Ohio St. 3d 22, 11 Ohio B. 55, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1094 (Ohio 1984).

462 N.E.2d 1221 (Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Jewett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Guest
528 N.E.2d 193 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)