Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Epling

Ohio Supreme Court

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Epling

238 N.E.2d 558, 15 Ohio St. 2d 23, 44 Ohio Op. 2d 14, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 366

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 19, 1968

DocketD. D. No. 83

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 238 N.E.2d 558 (Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Epling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Epling, 238 N.E.2d 558, 15 Ohio St. 2d 23, 44 Ohio Op. 2d 14, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 366 (Ohio 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent complains that the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline was prejudiced against him by reason of the fact that the board was aware of the former reprimand administered to him by this court. A thorough search of the record discloses that there is no foundation whatsoever for such a contention. On the other hand, the record does disclose that in the single instance where there was a conflict of testimony— Charge No. 2 — the board dismissed the complaint.

The objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, the conclusions and recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline are approved, and it is the judgment of this court that the respondent be, and he hereby is, suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period.

Judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI