Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Baratta
This text of 23 N.E.3d 1180 (Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Baratta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law filed its final report on August 27, 2014, recommending that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(7)(G), the court issue an order finding that respondents, Robert M. Baratta and Ertemio R. Baratta, a.k.a. Tim Baratta, engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and requiring respondents to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the board and relator in this matter. Respondents filed no objections to the final report, and this cause was considered by the court.
On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 N.E.3d 1180, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-state-bar-assn-v-baratta-ohio-2015.