Ohio Public Employees Deferred Compensation Progam v. Sicherman

140 S. Ct. 2987
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1527
StatusPublished

This text of 140 S. Ct. 2987 (Ohio Public Employees Deferred Compensation Progam v. Sicherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ohio Public Employees Deferred Compensation Progam v. Sicherman, 140 S. Ct. 2987 (U.S. 1992).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2242, — L.Ed.2d - (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. Shumate
504 U.S. 753 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S. Ct. 2987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-public-employees-deferred-compensation-progam-v-sicherman-scotus-1992.