Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana

177 U.S. 212, 20 S. Ct. 585
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 9, 1900·No. NO. 2; No. 83·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice White

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant below was sued for the sum of certain penalties imposed by law for allowing gas to escape into the atmospheric air from an oil and gas well. The statute by which the penalties wrere imposed is the one we have considered and passed on in an opinion .this dajr delivered in Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, No. 84, of this term. The defendant demurred to the complaint, and when the demurrer was overruled answered. The answer alleged that the statute imposing the penalties was repugnant to the Constitution of the United States, on the same grounds which we have to-day disposed of in the case .referred to: From a judgment awarding the penalties, [213]*213which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana, this writ of error is prosecuted. For the reasons given in case No. 84 the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, 177 U.S. 212, 20 S. Ct. 585 (1900).

177 U.S. 212 (Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacK Oil Company v. Laurence
1964 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1964)
Erickson v. Crookston Waterworks, Power & Light Co.
111 N.W. 391 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1907)