Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown

Supreme Court

Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown

312 U.S. 652, 61 S. Ct. 616, 85 L. Ed. 1103, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 973

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 3, 1941

DocketNo. 689

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 312 U.S. 652 (Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown, 312 U.S. 652, 61 S. Ct. 616, 85 L. Ed. 1103, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 973 (1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question: (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission of California, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52, 54.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question: (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission of California, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52, 54.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

312 U.S. 652, 61 S. Ct. 616, 85 L. Ed. 1103, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-ex-rel-squire-v-brown-scotus-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack