Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown

Supreme Court

Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown

312 U.S. 652, 61 S. Ct. 616, 85 L. Ed. 1103, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 973

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 3, 1941·No. No. 689·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question: (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission of California, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52, 54.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question: (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission of California, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52, 54.

Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown, 312 U.S. 652, 61 S. Ct. 616, 85 L. Ed. 1103, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 973 (1941).

Pincite

312 U.S. 652 (Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related