Ohio ex rel. Allen v. Lutz

Supreme Court

Ohio ex rel. Allen v. Lutz

273 U.S. 654, 47 S. Ct. 333

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 10, 1927

DocketNo. 89

StatusPublished

This text of 273 U.S. 654 (Ohio ex rel. Allen v. Lutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ohio ex rel. Allen v. Lutz, 273 U.S. 654, 47 S. Ct. 333 (1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed under § 237 of the Judicial Code, it not appearing in the record of the case that prior to the final judgment to which this writ of error was allowed there was any challenging averment that the act of the Ohio Legislature in question was repugnant to the Constitution or laws of the United States. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed under § 237 of the Judicial Code, it not appearing in the record of the case that prior to the final judgment to which this writ of error was allowed there was any challenging averment that the act of the Ohio Legislature in question was repugnant to the Constitution or laws of the United States. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 U.S. 654, 47 S. Ct. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-ex-rel-allen-v-lutz-scotus-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack