Ohio Cloverleaf Dairy Co. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
34 F.2d 1022, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9650, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365
This text of 34 F.2d 1022 (Ohio Cloverleaf Dairy Co. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ohio Cloverleaf Dairy Co. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 34 F.2d 1022, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9650, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365 (6th Cir. 1929).
Opinion
OHIO CLOVERLEAF DAIRY CO.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Marshall, Melhorn, Marlar & Martin, of Toledo, Ohio, and Harry J. Gerrity, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Order of Board of Tax Appeals affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 F.2d 1022, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9650, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohio-cloverleaf-dairy-co-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1929.