Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 266
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ohio St. 385
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1925·No. 18740·Published

Opinion

error to Trumbull Appeals. Judgment affirmed.

Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Marshall, C. J., concurs in proposition 2 of the syllabus and in the judgment. Jones and Robinson, JJ., concur in proposition 2 of the syllabus and favor modification of the judgment. „ ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co., 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 266 (Ohio 1925).

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 266 (Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.