O'Harrow v. Henderson

52 F. 769, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1962
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
DecidedOctober 10, 1892
DocketNo. 7,958
StatusPublished

This text of 52 F. 769 (O'Harrow v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Harrow v. Henderson, 52 F. 769, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1962 (circtdin 1892).

Opinion

Baker, District Judge,

(after stating the facts.) This is an action sounding in tort for wrongful arrest and imprisonment and for malicious prosecution. The wrongs are alleged to have been jointly committed by the defendants. The cause must be remanded. One of two or more defendants, sued as joint wrongdoers, cannot remove such cause of action from a state court into the United States circuit court. It has often been decided that an action brought in a state court against two, jointly, for a tort, cannot be removed by either of them into the circuit court of the United States, under Act March 3, 1875, c. 137, § 2, upon the ground of a separate controversy between the plaintiff and himself. The fact that the defendant asking the removal has filed separate defenses does not make the cause of action separable, although the plaintiff might have brought the action against either alone. Pirie v. Tvedt, 115 U. S. 41, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1034, 1161; Sloane v. Anderson, 117 U, S. 275, 6 [770]*770Sup. Ct. Rep. 730; Plymouth Consolidated Gold Min. Co. v. Amador & S. Canal Co., 118 U. S. 264, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1034; Hedge Co. v. Fuller, 122 U. S. 535, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1265; Railroad Co. v. Wangelin, 132 U. S. 599, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 203. Remanded. Exception by defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pirie v. Tvedt
115 U.S. 41 (Supreme Court, 1885)
Thorn Wire Hedge Co. v. Fuller
122 U.S. 535 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Wangelin
132 U.S. 599 (Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F. 769, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oharrow-v-henderson-circtdin-1892.