O'Hare v. Fink
35 N.W.2d 322, 254 Wis. 69, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Hare v. Fink. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 Wis. 65 →
Opinion
The only questions sought to be raised concern the correctness of the trial court’s rulings during the trial. The bill of exceptions having been stricken (O’Hare v. Fink, ante, p. 65, 35 N. W. (2d) 320) and the pleadings and findings being sufficient to sustain the judgment, the judgment must be affirmed.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Hare v. Fink, 35 N.W.2d 322, 254 Wis. 69, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 246 (Wis. 1948).
35 N.W.2d 322 (O'Hare v. Fink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Hare v. Fink
35 N.W.2d 320 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1948)