O'Hara v. Third Avenue Railroad
Opinion
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, through the negligence of the defendant.. The plaintiff,, on March. 6,1892, while in the act of sweeping Third avenue as an employee of the street, cleaning department of the city of Kew York, was struck by the horses; attached to a car belonging to the defendant, knocked down and severely injured.
A careful examination of the whole case shows that under the peculiar circumstances of this case.the questions of defendant’s negligence and of plaintiff’s contributory negligence were questions ¿f fact for the jury.; that they were' properly submitted, and that no sufficient reason exists for which the judgment or order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial should be disturbed.
The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
McAdam, J., concurs.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
11 Misc. 708 (O'Hara v. Third Avenue Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.