O'Hara v. Comptroller of Maryland

Fourth Circuit

O'Hara v. Comptroller of Maryland

670 F. App'x 777

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 16-1684·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis M. O’Hara appeals- the district court’s orders dismissing his petition for ■writ of mandamus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. O’Hara v. Comptroller of Md., No. 8:14—cv-04044-TDC, 2015 WL 6739154, 2016 WL 2760337 (D. Md. Nov. 3, 2015 & May 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis M. O’Hara appeals- the district court’s orders dismissing his petition for ■writ of mandamus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. O’Hara v. Comptroller of Md., No. 8:14—cv-04044-TDC, 2015 WL 6739154, 2016 WL 2760337 (D. Md. Nov. 3, 2015 & May 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

O'Hara v. Comptroller of Maryland, 670 F. App'x 777 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 777 (O'Hara v. Comptroller of Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.