O'Hara v. California
390 F.2d 878
This text of 390 F.2d 878 (O'Hara v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Hara v. California, 390 F.2d 878 (9th Cir. 1968).
Opinion
The appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State custody; remedies in Federal courts
28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
390 F.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohara-v-california-ca9-1968.