O'Hara v. Bayliner

248 A.D.2d 149, 670 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 5, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 149 (O'Hara v. Bayliner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Hara v. Bayliner, 248 A.D.2d 149, 670 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered April 4, April 19 and November 6, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendants-respondents’ motion for a protective order of confidentiality, and denied plaintiffs cross motion to compel disclosure, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

The appeals are moot in view of the Court of Appeals’ decision, subsequent to the orders appealed from, that the action is barred under the admiralty Statute of Limitations (89 NY2d 636, cert denied 522 US 822).

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Grasso
54 A.D.3d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Linderman v. Pennsylvania Building Co.
289 A.D.2d 77 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 149, 670 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohara-v-bayliner-nyappdiv-1998.