O'Hara v. Bayliner
248 A.D.2d 149, 670 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—Appeal from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered April 4, April 19 and November 6, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendants-respondents’ motion for a protective order of confidentiality, and denied plaintiffs cross motion to compel disclosure, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.
The appeals are moot in view of the Court of Appeals’ decision, subsequent to the orders appealed from, that the action is barred under the admiralty Statute of Limitations (89 NY2d 636, cert denied 522 US 822).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Hara v. Bayliner, 248 A.D.2d 149, 670 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
248 A.D.2d 149 (O'Hara v. Bayliner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Grasso
54 A.D.3d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Linderman v. Pennsylvania Building Co.
289 A.D.2d 77 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)