O'Hanlon v. Wrobel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Hanlon v. Wrobel

300 A.D.2d 638, 752 N.Y.S.2d 571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 638 (O'Hanlon v. Wrobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Hanlon v. Wrobel, 300 A.D.2d 638, 752 N.Y.S.2d 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Sweeny, J.), dated December 19, 2001, as granted the motion of the defendant Agatha A. Wrobel for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the respondent. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Sweeny, J.), dated December 19, 2001, as granted the motion of the defendant Agatha A. Wrobel for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the respondent. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 638, 752 N.Y.S.2d 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohanlon-v-wrobel-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack