Ohanian v. Ohanian
This text of 306 S.W.3d 193 (Ohanian v. Ohanian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Elizabeth Haney appeals the trial court’s judgment modifying custody and child support arrangements with her children’s father, Michael Ohanian. We affirm. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 S.W.3d 193, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2010 WL 933218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ohanian-v-ohanian-moctapp-2010.