Ohanian v. Ohanian

306 S.W.3d 193, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2010 WL 933218
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 2010·No. ED 92721·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth Haney appeals the trial court’s judgment modifying custody and child support arrangements with her children’s father, Michael Ohanian. We affirm. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ohanian v. Ohanian, 306 S.W.3d 193, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2010 WL 933218 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

306 S.W.3d 193 (Ohanian v. Ohanian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)