O'Hagan v. Johnson
163 N.C. 197
Opinion
We have examined the record, and see no reason for disturbing the decree entered in the Superior Court.
The proceedings are regular, and have been prepared with great care, indicating patient investigation and a familiarity with the legal principles involved.
The decree is fully sustained by Springs v. Scott, 132 N. C., 548; Hodges v. Lipscomb, 133 N. C., 199, and Trust Co. v. Nicholson, 162 N. C., 257, and upon the authority of these eases the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Hagan v. Johnson, 163 N.C. 197 (N.C. 1913).
163 N.C. 197 (O'Hagan v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Trust Co. v. Nicholson
78 S.E. 152 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Hodges v. Lipscomb.
45 S.E. 556 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
Springs v. Scott
44 S.E. 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)