Oh v. Westchester County Department of Consumer Protection

287 A.D.2d 721, 732 N.Y.S.2d 59, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10041
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 287 A.D.2d 721 (Oh v. Westchester County Department of Consumer Protection) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oh v. Westchester County Department of Consumer Protection, 287 A.D.2d 721, 732 N.Y.S.2d 59, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Westchester County Department of Consumer Protection, dated February 22, 2001, which, after a hearing, denied the application of Crest Design Construction for a home improvement license, the petitioner John Oh appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated April 30, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the individual petitioner John Oh does not have standing to seek review of the Westchester County Department of Consumer Protection’s (hereinafter the Department) denial of a home improvement license, since the only applicant for the license was the corporate petitioner Crest Design Construction, Inc. (see, Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 772; Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley, 38 NY2d 6, 9). Furthermore, although the corporate petitioner is the proper party to petition for review of the Department’s determination, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding as to that petitioner, since it failed to appear by counsel as required pursuant to CPLR 321 (see, CPLR 321 [a]; Hilton Apothecary v State of New York, 89 NY2d 1024; Cinderella Holding Corp. v Calvert Ins. Co., 265 AD2d 444; Matter of Pere v 1470-1488 U&R, 247 AD2d 477, 478). Ritter, J. P., Goldstein, Friedmann, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tenants Committee of 36 Gramercy Park v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
108 A.D.3d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 A.D.2d 721, 732 N.Y.S.2d 59, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oh-v-westchester-county-department-of-consumer-protection-nyappdiv-2001.