Ogunsula v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Ogunsula v. Holder

641 F. App'x 260

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 21, 2016

DocketNo. 15-1929

StatusPublished

This text of 641 F. App'x 260 (Ogunsula v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ogunsula v. Holder, 641 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Veronica W. Ogunsula appeals the district court’s order denying her emergency motion for an order to vacate and rescind eviction and dismissing her civil complaint in part without prejudice and in part with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ogunsula v. Holder, No. 8:15-cv-01297-GJH, 2015 WL 3892126 (D.Md. filed June 22 & entered June 23, 2015). We deny Ogunsula’s motions for a temporary restraining order, stay pending appeal, emergency relief, and to expedite the decision, and all other pending motions, with the exception of Ogunsula’s motion to seal her motion to expedite. We grant the motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Veronica W. Ogunsula appeals the district court’s order denying her emergency motion for an order to vacate and rescind eviction and dismissing her civil complaint in part without prejudice and in part with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ogunsula v. Holder, No. 8:15-cv-01297-GJH, 2015 WL 3892126 (D.Md. filed June 22 & entered June 23, 2015). We deny Ogunsula’s motions for a temporary restraining order, stay pending appeal, emergency relief, and to expedite the decision, and all other pending motions, with the exception of Ogunsula’s motion to seal her motion to expedite. We grant the motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 F. App'x 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogunsula-v-holder-ca4-2016.