Ogunde v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

22 F. App'x 296
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ogunde v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 F. App'x 508
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2001·No. 01-6510·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Oludare Ogunde appeals from the district court’s order denying Ogunde’s motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Ogunde failed to establish any grounds on which the motion could be granted. In re Burnley, 988 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir.1992). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. United States v. Holland, 214 F.3d 523, 527 (4th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogunde v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, 22 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2001).

22 F. App'x 296 (Ogunde v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re John Rodgers Burnley
988 F.2d 1 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Holland
214 F.3d 523 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)