Oguma v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Oguma v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 2012

Docket2012-3053

StatusUnpublished

This text of Oguma v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Oguma v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oguma v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit PATRICK H. OGUMA, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Responden,t. 2012-3053 0 Petition for review of the Me1‘it Systems Protection Board in case no. SF3443110113-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER The Department of the NaVy moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protecti0n Board as respondent A1so, the Department of the Navy moves for a 21-day extension of time for the Board to file its brief Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when

OGUMA v. MSPB 2 the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Oguma’s appeal for lack of jurisdic- tion. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review Accordingly, I'r ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board’s response brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order. __ FoR THE CoURT 1 2 ls/ Jan Horba1y Date J an Ho1'baly Clerk cc: Patrick H. Oguma . Russe11 J. Upton, Esq. Lindsey Schreckengost, Esq. FlLED S21 u.s.c0un1oFAPPEAis mn rHE1=EntnALcn=:cu:r NAR '| 2 2012 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit PATRICK H. OGUMA, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Responden,t. 2012-3053 0 Petition for review of the Me1‘it Systems Protection Board in case no. SF3443110113-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER The Department of the NaVy moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protecti0n Board as respondent A1so, the Department of the Navy moves for a 21-day extension of time for the Board to file its brief Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when

OGUMA v. MSPB 2 the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Oguma’s appeal for lack of jurisdic- tion. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review Accordingly, I'r ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board’s response brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order. __ FoR THE CoURT 1 2 ls/ Jan Horba1y Date J an Ho1'baly Clerk cc: Patrick H. Oguma . Russe11 J. Upton, Esq. Lindsey Schreckengost, Esq. FlLED S21 u.s.c0un1oFAPPEAis mn rHE1=EntnALcn=:cu:r NAR '| 2 2012 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Oguma v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oguma-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack