O'Grady v. Boudin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Grady v. Boudin

125 A.D.2d 652, 510 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62933

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 125 A.D.2d 652 (O'Grady v. Boudin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Grady v. Boudin, 125 A.D.2d 652, 510 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, etc., the defendant Samuel Brown appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Gurahian, J.), entered September 17, 1985, as denied his motion to stay any further proceedings in this action pending completion of his appeal to this court from a judgment of conviction involving the same death and injury involved in the instant matter.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

An application for a stay of the proceedings in an action is addressed to the discretion of the court. Clearly, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant Brown’s motion to stay any further proceedings in the instant wrongful death and personal injury action. The record on appeal is devoid of any showing of prejudice which would inure to Brown as a result of the denial of a stay. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, etc., the defendant Samuel Brown appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Gurahian, J.), entered September 17, 1985, as denied his motion to stay any further proceedings in this action pending completion of his appeal to this court from a judgment of conviction involving the same death and injury involved in the instant matter.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

An application for a stay of the proceedings in an action is addressed to the discretion of the court. Clearly, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant Brown’s motion to stay any further proceedings in the instant wrongful death and personal injury action. The record on appeal is devoid of any showing of prejudice which would inure to Brown as a result of the denial of a stay. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 A.D.2d 652, 510 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogrady-v-boudin-nyappdiv-1986.