O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.

133 P.2d 318, 102 Utah 534, 1943 Utah LEXIS 135
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 20, 1943
DocketNo. 6456.
StatusPublished

This text of 133 P.2d 318 (O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co., 133 P.2d 318, 102 Utah 534, 1943 Utah LEXIS 135 (Utah 1943).

Opinion

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

On petition for rehearing our attention is called to the fact that we reversed this cause as to all the defendants. Since our opinion 102 Utah 523, 129 P. 2d 981, discloses that there were no errors in the judgment of the lower court as to the defendants Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment as to them should stand. Therefore, our order should-be modified to read as follows: “for the reason that the findings do not support the judgment on the counterclaim, the cause is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial as between plaintiff O’Gorman and Ruth and Eli Hampton. As to the issues raised between plaintiff and Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.”'

With this modification, the petition for rehearing is. denied.

LARSON, McDONOUGH, and MOFFAT, JJ., concur. WADE, J., votes to grant a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.
129 P.2d 981 (Utah Supreme Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 P.2d 318, 102 Utah 534, 1943 Utah LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogorman-v-utah-realty-construction-co-utah-1943.