O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.

133 P.2d 318, 102 Utah 534, 1943 Utah LEXIS 135
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 Utah 523
Utah Supreme Court·Decided January 20, 1943·No. No. 6456.·Published

Opinion

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

On petition for rehearing our attention is called to the fact that we reversed this cause as to all the defendants. Since our opinion 102 Utah 523, 129 P. 2d 981, discloses that there were no errors in the judgment of the lower court as to the defendants Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment as to them should stand. Therefore, our order should-be modified to read as follows: “for the reason that the findings do not support the judgment on the counterclaim, the cause is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial as between plaintiff O’Gorman and Ruth and Eli Hampton. As to the issues raised between plaintiff and Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.”'

With this modification, the petition for rehearing is. denied.

LARSON, McDONOUGH, and MOFFAT, JJ., concur. WADE, J., votes to grant a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co., 133 P.2d 318, 102 Utah 534, 1943 Utah LEXIS 135 (Utah 1943).

133 P.2d 318 (O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.
129 P.2d 981 (Utah Supreme Court, 1942)