O'Gorman v. O'Gorman

181 S.E.2d 490, 227 Ga. 468, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 739
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 8, 1971·No. 26389·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

This appeal involves rulings made in a divorce and alimony case. All the enumerations of error require consideration of the evidence. However, appellant specified in his notice of appeal that no transcript be filed in the record of appeal, and none has been sent to this court. Furthermore, no stipulation showing the facts necessary for rulings by this court has been entered into and filed. The duty rests upon the appellant to have the transcript prepared if needed for decision here. Code Ann. §6-805 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24). Without the transcript we must assume that the evidence authorized the judgments. Under these circumstances the judgments complained of must be affirmed. See Graham v. Haley, 224 Ga. 498 (162 SE2d 346).

Judgments affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Gorman v. O'Gorman, 181 S.E.2d 490, 227 Ga. 468, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 739 (Ga. 1971).

181 S.E.2d 490 (O'Gorman v. O'Gorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griggs v. Griggs
216 S.E.2d 311 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Tolbert v. Tolbert
206 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Drake v. Drake
200 S.E.2d 719 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Lucas v. Lucas
191 S.E.2d 29 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Taylor v. Taylor
184 S.E.2d 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)