O'Gorman v. O'Gorman

Supreme Court of Georgia

O'Gorman v. O'Gorman

181 S.E.2d 490, 227 Ga. 468, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 739

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 8, 1971

Docket26389

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 181 S.E.2d 490 (O'Gorman v. O'Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Gorman v. O'Gorman, 181 S.E.2d 490, 227 Ga. 468, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 739 (Ga. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

This appeal involves rulings made in a divorce and alimony case. All the enumerations of error require consideration of the evidence. However, appellant specified in his notice of appeal that no transcript be filed in the record of appeal, and none has been sent to this court. Furthermore, no stipulation showing the facts necessary for rulings by this court has been entered into and filed. The duty rests upon the appellant to have the transcript prepared if needed for decision here. Code Ann. §6-805 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24). Without the transcript we must assume that the evidence authorized the judgments. Under these circumstances the judgments complained of must be affirmed. See Graham v. Haley, 224 Ga. 498 (162 SE2d 346).

Judgments affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

This appeal involves rulings made in a divorce and alimony case. All the enumerations of error require consideration of the evidence. However, appellant specified in his notice of appeal that no transcript be filed in the record of appeal, and none has been sent to this court. Furthermore, no stipulation showing the facts necessary for rulings by this court has been entered into and filed. The duty rests upon the appellant to have the transcript prepared if needed for decision here. Code Ann. §6-805 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24). Without the transcript we must assume that the evidence authorized the judgments. Under these circumstances the judgments complained of must be affirmed. See Graham v. Haley, 224 Ga. 498 (162 SE2d 346).

Judgments affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 S.E.2d 490, 227 Ga. 468, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogorman-v-ogorman-ga-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack