Oglesby v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Oglesby v. State

1925 OK CR 23, 232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 37, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 17, 1925

DocketNo. A-5220.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 23 (Oglesby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oglesby v. State, 1925 OK CR 23, 232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 37, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Will Oglesby, was convicted on a charge of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at confinement for 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $75. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, March 1, 1924, he appealed by filing in this court on June 21 a petition in error, with case-made. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground and for the reason that no notices of appeal were ever served on the clerk of the court or the prosecuting attorney in this case as .is required by law. An examination of the record discloses: that the motion to dismiss is well taken. The appeal herein is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Will Oglesby, was convicted on a charge of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at confinement for 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $75. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, March 1, 1924, he appealed by filing in this court on June 21 a petition in error, with case-made. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground and for the reason that no notices of appeal were ever served on the clerk of the court or the prosecuting attorney in this case as .is required by law. An examination of the record discloses: that the motion to dismiss is well taken. The appeal herein is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 23, 232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 37, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oglesby-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.