Oglesby v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Oglesby v. State

232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 230

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 18, 1925·No. No. A-5219.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Will Oglesby, was convicted on a charge that he did manufacture intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the verdict he appealed, by filing in this court on June 21/1924, petition in error, with case-made. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground and for the reason that no notices of appeal were ever served on the clerk of the court or the county attorney in this case, as is required by law. An examination of the record dis *231 closes that the motion to dismiss is well taken. The appeal herein is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Will Oglesby, was convicted on a charge that he did manufacture intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the verdict he appealed, by filing in this court on June 21/1924, petition in error, with case-made. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground and for the reason that no notices of appeal were ever served on the clerk of the court or the county attorney in this case, as is required by law. An examination of the record dis *231 closes that the motion to dismiss is well taken. The appeal herein is therefore dismissed.

Oglesby v. State, 232 P. 1118, 29 Okla. Crim. 230 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

232 P. 1118 (Oglesby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related