Oglesby v. State
145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 687, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 397
This text of 145 S.E. 672 (Oglesby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oglesby v. State, 145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 687, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 397 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
1. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.
2. The single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 687, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oglesby-v-state-gactapp-1928.